On Tue, Feb 12, 2019 at 10:40:14AM +0100, Koen Vandeputte wrote: > > On 11.02.19 18:02, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote: > > > > > > Dear Greg, > > > > > > No idea if this is the proper location to report this or if I should > > > inform > > > stable@vger.. , but: > > > > > > This backport alone is useless without backporting following 2 commits > > > below > > > also, unless the 2 wifi devices using dynack start off at very close > > > distance. > > > > > > Their commits messages indicate them as improvements, but they should be > > > considered as fixes. > > > > > > > > > https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux.git/commit/?h=v5.0-rc6&id=0c60c490830a1a756c80f8de8d33d9c6359d4a36 > > > > > > https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux.git/commit/?h=v5.0-rc6&id=9d3d65a91f027b8a9af5e63752d9b78cb10eb92d > > > > > > > > > It's safe to add them to all stables involved (4.20, 4.19, 4.14, 4.9) > > Thanks, that looks reasonable, now queued up. > > > > greg k-h > > > Hi Greg, > > Just noticed the primary dynack patch also got merged into 4.4 stable rc > > Could you also apply the 2 fixes above to 4.4? > > > Checked older versions (< 4.4) .. and they are not required there.
The build breaks when the series in on 4.4, so I dropped the patches from there, and 3.18. If you want to send a backported series that builds properly, I will be glad to queue that up. thanks, greg k-h
