On Mon, Feb 11, 2019 at 01:04:59PM +0000, Peng Fan wrote:
> arm_memory_present is doing same thing as memblocks_present, so
> let's use common code memblocks_present instead of platform
> specific arm_memory_present.
>
> Signed-off-by: Peng Fan <peng....@nxp.com>
Looks good, please put it in the patch system, thanks. Details in
my signature.
> ---
> arch/arm/mm/init.c | 17 +----------------
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 16 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/arch/arm/mm/init.c b/arch/arm/mm/init.c
> index 478ea8b7db87..6c50dd407ba8 100644
> --- a/arch/arm/mm/init.c
> +++ b/arch/arm/mm/init.c
> @@ -182,21 +182,6 @@ int pfn_valid(unsigned long pfn)
> EXPORT_SYMBOL(pfn_valid);
> #endif
>
> -#ifndef CONFIG_SPARSEMEM
> -static void __init arm_memory_present(void)
> -{
> -}
> -#else
> -static void __init arm_memory_present(void)
> -{
> - struct memblock_region *reg;
> -
> - for_each_memblock(memory, reg)
> - memory_present(0, memblock_region_memory_base_pfn(reg),
> - memblock_region_memory_end_pfn(reg));
> -}
> -#endif
> -
> static bool arm_memblock_steal_permitted = true;
>
> phys_addr_t __init arm_memblock_steal(phys_addr_t size, phys_addr_t align)
> @@ -292,7 +277,7 @@ void __init bootmem_init(void)
> * Sparsemem tries to allocate bootmem in memory_present(),
> * so must be done after the fixed reservations
> */
> - arm_memory_present();
> + memblocks_present();
>
> /*
> * sparse_init() needs the bootmem allocator up and running.
> --
> 2.16.4
>
>
--
RMK's Patch system: https://www.armlinux.org.uk/developer/patches/
FTTC broadband for 0.8mile line in suburbia: sync at 12.1Mbps down 622kbps up
According to speedtest.net: 11.9Mbps down 500kbps up
