On Wed, Feb 13, 2019 at 6:22 AM Stephen Rothwell <s...@canb.auug.org.au> wrote:
> On Tue, 22 Jan 2019 14:10:27 +1100 Stephen Rothwell <s...@canb.auug.org.au>
> wrote:
> >
> > Today's linux-next merge of the pidfd tree got conflicts in:
> >
> > arch/x86/entry/syscalls/syscall_32.tbl
> > arch/x86/entry/syscalls/syscall_64.tbl
> > include/uapi/asm-generic/unistd.h
> >
> > between commits:
> >
> > 63a96220ad45 ("arch: add split IPC system calls where needed")
> > 0bd4bb9c5612 ("y2038: add 64-bit time_t syscalls to all 32-bit
> > architectures")
> >
> > from the y2038 tree and commit:
> >
> > 3d2991bc7a67 ("signal: add pidfd_send_signal() syscall")
> >
> > from the pidfd tree.
>
> This is now a conflict between the block, tip and pidfd trees. The
> resolution now looks like below.
Checked it again, still looks good. Thanks,
Arnd
