On Wed, 13 Feb 2019 at 22:28, Arnd Bergmann <a...@arndb.de> wrote: > > On Wed, Feb 13, 2019 at 1:57 PM Baolin Wang <baolin.w...@linaro.org> wrote: > > > > We should use SoC compatible string in stead of wildcard string for > > PMIC child devices. > > > > Signed-off-by: Baolin Wang <baolin.w...@linaro.org> > > Looks good. I had a look at arch/arm64/boot/dts/sprd/sc2731.dtsi > as well, which contains lines such as > > compatible = "sprd,sc27xx-efuse", "sprd,sc2731-efuse"; > > which fortunately work with both variants of the driver. > Just to make sure we have the same understanding though: > > - Other drivers will leave out the 27xx part and just do > compatible = sprd,sc2732-efuse", "sprd,sc2731-efuse"; > > - When you specific a generic name (such as the sc2731 part), > the more specific one (e.g. sc2732) needs to come /first/. > The current DT appears to have those mixed up.
Yes, that's the conclusion we made. And I've send patches to remove the 27xx part in drivers. Thanks for your help. -- Baolin Wang Best Regards
