On 2/15/2019 11:47 AM, Stephen Boyd wrote:
Quoting Jeffrey Hugo (2019-02-11 08:09:00)
On 1/28/2019 11:10 PM, Stephen Boyd wrote:
+static int clk_init_parent(struct clk_core *core)
+{
+ core->parent = __clk_init_parent(core, true);
+ if (IS_ERR(core->parent))
+ return PTR_ERR(core->parent);
+
+ /*
+ * Populate core->parent if parent has already been clk_core_init'd. If
+ * parent has not yet been clk_core_init'd then place clk in the orphan
+ * list. If clk doesn't have any parents then place it in the root
+ * clk list.
+ *
+ * Every time a new clk is clk_init'd then we walk the list of orphan
+ * clocks and re-parent any that are children of the clock currently
+ * being clk_init'd.
+ */
+ if (core->parent) {
+ hlist_add_head(&core->child_node,
+ &core->parent->children);
+ core->orphan = core->parent->orphan;
+ } else if (!core->num_parents) {
+ hlist_add_head(&core->child_node, &clk_root_list);
+ core->orphan = false;
+ } else {
+ hlist_add_head(&core->child_node, &clk_orphan_list);
Missing "core->orphan = true;"?
The snippet below had that line. Its not clear why it appears to be
dropped here.
Hmm. Weird. I think I may have been getting ahead of myself and moving
the orphan updating code into __clk_init_parent(). I can't remember why
though, so I guess I'll go all the way and move it all into
__clk_init_parent() now. Thanks for pointing it out.
No problem.
Just FYI, I've rebased the 8998 mmcc series on top of this, and as far
as I can tell, everything seems to be working great.
--
Jeffrey Hugo
Qualcomm Datacenter Technologies as an affiliate of Qualcomm
Technologies, Inc.
Qualcomm Technologies, Inc. is a member of the
Code Aurora Forum, a Linux Foundation Collaborative Project.
