Hi, On Tue, 7 Aug 2007, Andrew Morton wrote:
> I'd be surprised if there was significant overhead - the maximum frequency > at which msleep() can be called is 1000Hz. We'd need an awful lot of > overhead for that to cause problems, surely? > > <thinks he's missing something again> _Anybody_ has yet to answer what's wrong with adding a nanosleep() and using that instead. bye, Roman - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/