On 12.02.2019 16:09, Jiri Olsa wrote: > On Mon, Feb 11, 2019 at 11:23:40PM +0300, Alexey Budankov wrote: > > SNIP > >> + compress_fn = (record__comp_enabled(rec) ? >> + perf_session__zstd_compress : perf_session__zstd_copy); >> + >> if (record__aio_enabled(rec)) >> off = record__aio_get_pos(trace_fd); >> >> @@ -799,11 +805,21 @@ static int record__mmap_read_evlist(struct record >> *rec, struct perf_evlist *evli >> map->flush = MMAP_FLUSH_DEFAULT; >> } >> if (!record__aio_enabled(rec)) { >> - if (perf_mmap__push(map, rec, record__pushfn) >> != 0) { >> - if (sync) >> - map->flush = flush; >> - rc = -1; >> - goto out; >> + if (!record__comp_enabled(rec)) { >> + if (perf_mmap__push(map, rec, >> record__pushfn) != 0) { >> + if (sync) >> + map->flush = flush; >> + rc = -1; >> + goto out; >> + } >> + } else { >> + if (perf_mmap__pack(map, rec, >> record__pushfn, >> + compress_fn, session) >> != 0) { >> + if (sync) >> + map->flush = flush; >> + rc = -1; >> + goto out; >> + } > > I really dont like this.. the non-compression flow needs to stay untouched > > why don't you overload the record__pushfn function for compression > processing and stash the data in there?
Yes, this becomes complicated and overloading could be an option to simplify it. Thanks, Alexey > > thanks, > jirka >