On Wed, 2019-02-20 at 19:48 +0100, Benjamin Block wrote: > We had a test-report where, under memory pressure, adding LUNs to the > systems would fail (the tests add LUNs strictly in sequence):
Hi Benjamin, There are two more instances of GFP_ATOMIC in scsi_scan.c. Have you verified whether or not it is safe to change these into GFP_KERNEL too? Thanks, Bart.
