Hi,

On 21/2/19 0:09, Randy Dunlap wrote:
> On 2/20/19 2:11 PM, Nick Crews wrote:
>> In the initial version of the Wilco EC Driver, the
>> dependency order was wrong. It before was possible to
>> select CONFIG_WILCO_EC and CONFIG_CROS_EC_LPC without
>> having CONFIG_CROS_EC_LPC_MEC. This was wrong, since
>> WILCO_EC depends upon CONFIG CROS_EC_LPC_MEC, not the
>> other way around.
>>
>> Fixes: 1733c32834e5d1 ("platform/chrome: Add new driver for Wilco EC")
>> Signed-off-by: Nick Crews <ncr...@chromium.org>
> 
> Reported-by: Randy Dunlap <rdun...@infradead.org>
> Acked-by: Randy Dunlap <rdun...@infradead.org> # build-tested
> 

As this is [-next] material I squashed that commit and queued for 5.1

Thanks,
 Enric


> Thanks.
> 
>> ---
>>  drivers/platform/chrome/Kconfig          | 2 +-
>>  drivers/platform/chrome/wilco_ec/Kconfig | 3 +--
>>  2 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/platform/chrome/Kconfig 
>> b/drivers/platform/chrome/Kconfig
>> index 462eb9dfa4f2..b69561050868 100644
>> --- a/drivers/platform/chrome/Kconfig
>> +++ b/drivers/platform/chrome/Kconfig
>> @@ -95,7 +95,7 @@ config CROS_EC_LPC
>>  
>>  config CROS_EC_LPC_MEC
>>      bool "ChromeOS Embedded Controller LPC Microchip EC (MEC) variant"
>> -    depends on CROS_EC_LPC || WILCO_EC
>> +    depends on CROS_EC_LPC
>>      default n
>>      help
>>        If you say Y here, a variant LPC protocol for the Microchip EC
>> diff --git a/drivers/platform/chrome/wilco_ec/Kconfig 
>> b/drivers/platform/chrome/wilco_ec/Kconfig
>> index 20945a301ec6..c6bc4e8f3062 100644
>> --- a/drivers/platform/chrome/wilco_ec/Kconfig
>> +++ b/drivers/platform/chrome/wilco_ec/Kconfig
>> @@ -1,7 +1,6 @@
>>  config WILCO_EC
>>      tristate "ChromeOS Wilco Embedded Controller"
>> -    depends on ACPI && X86
>> -    select CROS_EC_LPC_MEC
>> +    depends on ACPI && X86 && CROS_EC_LPC_MEC
>>      help
>>        If you say Y here, you get support for talking to the ChromeOS
>>        Wilco EC over an eSPI bus. This uses a simple byte-level protocol
>>
> 
> 

Reply via email to