From: Borislav Petkov <[email protected]>

This was caught while staring at the whole {set,get}_fs() machinery.

No functional changes.

Signed-off-by: Borislav Petkov <[email protected]>
Cc: Andy Lutomirski <[email protected]>
Cc: Jann Horn <[email protected]>
Cc: Linus Torvalds <[email protected]>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <[email protected]>
Cc: the arch/x86 maintainers <[email protected]>
Cc: "Tobin C. Harding" <[email protected]>
---
 arch/x86/include/asm/uaccess.h | 3 ---
 1 file changed, 3 deletions(-)

diff --git a/arch/x86/include/asm/uaccess.h b/arch/x86/include/asm/uaccess.h
index 780f2b42c8ef..e2ffedd51fd8 100644
--- a/arch/x86/include/asm/uaccess.h
+++ b/arch/x86/include/asm/uaccess.h
@@ -35,10 +35,7 @@ static inline void set_fs(mm_segment_t fs)
 }
 
 #define segment_eq(a, b)       ((a).seg == (b).seg)
-
 #define user_addr_max() (current->thread.addr_limit.seg)
-#define __addr_ok(addr)        \
-       ((unsigned long __force)(addr) < user_addr_max())
 
 /*
  * Test whether a block of memory is a valid user space address.
-- 
2.21.0

Reply via email to