4.20-stable review patch.  If anyone has any objections, please let me know.

------------------

From: Pierre Morel <[email protected]>

commit b10bd9a256aec504c14a7c9b6fccb6301ecf290a upstream.

When facility.76 MSAX3 is present for the guest we must issue a validity
interception if the CRYCBD is not valid.

The bit CRYCBD.31 is an effective field and tested at each guest level
and has for effect to mask the facility.76

It follows that if CRYCBD.31 is clear and AP is not in use  we do not
have to test the CRYCBD validatity even if facility.76 is present in the
host.

Fixes: 6ee74098201b ("KVM: s390: vsie: allow CRYCB FORMAT-0")
Cc: [email protected]

Signed-off-by: Pierre Morel <[email protected]>
Reported-by: Claudio Imbrenda <[email protected]>
Acked-by: David Hildenbrand <[email protected]>
Acked-by: Cornelia Huck <[email protected]>
Reviewed-by: Christian Borntraeger <[email protected]>
Message-Id: <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Christian Borntraeger <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <[email protected]>

---
 arch/s390/kvm/vsie.c |    2 +-
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)

--- a/arch/s390/kvm/vsie.c
+++ b/arch/s390/kvm/vsie.c
@@ -297,7 +297,7 @@ static int shadow_crycb(struct kvm_vcpu
        scb_s->crycbd = 0;
 
        apie_h = vcpu->arch.sie_block->eca & ECA_APIE;
-       if (!apie_h && !key_msk)
+       if (!apie_h && (!key_msk || fmt_o == CRYCB_FORMAT0))
                return 0;
 
        if (!crycb_addr)


Reply via email to