>
> On 23-Dec-2000 Daniel Stone wrote:
> >> > patching file arch/i386/kernel/smp.c
> >> > Reversed (or previously applied) patch detected! Assume -R? [n]
> >> > Apply anyway? [n] y
> >> > Hunk #1 FAILED at 278.
> >> > Hunk #2 succeeded at 511 (offset 9 lines).
> >> > 1 out of 2 hunks FAILED -- saving rejects to file
> >> > arch/i386/kernel/smp.c.rej
> >> >
> >> > Works fine if I reverse it and then put it back in. ?
> >>
> >> Its a bug in my patch - get 13pre4ac2 ..
> >
> > Um.
> > Subject: Re: test13-pre4-ac2 - part of diff fails
> > It's _IN_ 13-4ac2.
>
> I applied test13-pre4-ac2 here, and it applied cleanly.
> Are you applying it to a clean tree? Are your using
> patch v2.5.4 ? (that's the version I have)
linux-2.4.0-test12 + reiserfs + test13-pre4 + reiserfs makefile fix (only
changes fs/reiserfs/Makefile) + netfilter patch-o-matic stuff (only touches
net/ipv4/netfilter) + test13-pre4-ac2.
also seen on just linux-2.4.0-test12 + test13-pre4 + test13-pre4-ac2.
> FWIW, I was getting smp.c patch failures (well, it said the
> patch was previously applied) along with a bunch of
> IPTables stuff -- that was a couple of -ac's ago.
same here, just forgot to report it.
> AC1 and AC2 applied cleanly, tho AC1 wouldnt compile
> uniprocessor/no-quotas unless you added a
> #include <linux/smp_lock.h> to fs/ext2/balloc.c
> (i.e. it left some hanging refs to lock_kernel and
> unlock_kernel in fs.o, and I think there was also
> one in the UDF module. It's fixed in -ac2.
ac1 came out while I was asleep, and I woke up to ac2 being released.
d
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
