On Tue, Feb 26, 2019 at 6:07 PM Xiongfeng Wang <wangxiongfe...@huawei.com> wrote: > > When I ran Syzkaller testsuite, I got the following call trace. > ================================================================================ > UBSAN: Undefined behaviour in ./include/linux/time64.h:120:27 > signed integer overflow: > 8243129037239968815 * 1000000000 cannot be represented in type 'long long int' > CPU: 5 PID: 28854 Comm: syz-executor.1 Not tainted 4.19.24 #4 > Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (i440FX + PIIX, 1996), BIOS > rel-1.11.0-0-g63451fca13-prebuilt.qemu-project.org 04/01/2014 > Call Trace: > __dump_stack lib/dump_stack.c:77 [inline] > dump_stack+0xca/0x13e lib/dump_stack.c:113 > ubsan_epilogue+0xe/0x81 lib/ubsan.c:159 > handle_overflow+0x193/0x1e2 lib/ubsan.c:190 > timespec64_to_ns include/linux/time64.h:120 [inline] > posix_cpu_timer_set+0x95a/0xb70 kernel/time/posix-cpu-timers.c:687 > do_timer_settime+0x198/0x2a0 kernel/time/posix-timers.c:892 > __do_sys_timer_settime kernel/time/posix-timers.c:918 [inline] > __se_sys_timer_settime kernel/time/posix-timers.c:904 [inline] > __x64_sys_timer_settime+0x18d/0x260 kernel/time/posix-timers.c:904 > do_syscall_64+0xc8/0x580 arch/x86/entry/common.c:290 > entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x49/0xbe > RIP: 0033:0x462eb9 > Code: f7 d8 64 89 02 b8 ff ff ff ff c3 66 0f 1f 44 00 00 48 89 f8 48 89 f7 48 > 89 d6 48 89 ca 4d 89 c2 4d 89 c8 4c 8b 4c 24 08 0f 05 <48> 3d 01 f0 ff ff 73 > 01 c3 48 c7 c1 bc ff ff ff f7 d8 64 89 01 48 > RSP: 002b:00007f14e4127c58 EFLAGS: 00000246 ORIG_RAX: 00000000000000df > RAX: ffffffffffffffda RBX: 000000000073bfa0 RCX: 0000000000462eb9 > RDX: 0000000020000080 RSI: 0000000000000000 RDI: 0000000000000000 > RBP: 0000000000000004 R08: 0000000000000000 R09: 0000000000000000 > R10: 0000000000000000 R11: 0000000000000246 R12: 00007f14e41286bc > R13: 00000000004c54cc R14: 0000000000704278 R15: 00000000ffffffff > ================================================================================ > > This patch use 'timespec64_to_ktime()' to limit 'tv_sec' to avoid > overflow. > > Signed-off-by: Xiongfeng Wang <wangxiongfe...@huawei.com> > --- > kernel/time/posix-cpu-timers.c | 2 +- > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) > > diff --git a/kernel/time/posix-cpu-timers.c b/kernel/time/posix-cpu-timers.c > index 80f9552..f7e3929 100644 > --- a/kernel/time/posix-cpu-timers.c > +++ b/kernel/time/posix-cpu-timers.c > @@ -684,7 +684,7 @@ static int posix_cpu_timer_set(struct k_itimer *timer, > int timer_flags, > * Install the new reload setting, and > * set up the signal and overrun bookkeeping. > */ > - timer->it.cpu.incr = timespec64_to_ns(&new->it_interval); > + timer->it.cpu.incr = > ktime_to_ns(timespec64_to_ktime(new->it_interval)); > timer->it_interval = ns_to_ktime(timer->it.cpu.incr); > > /*
This seems like a similar bug as the other one https://lkml.org/lkml/2019/2/24/214. Maybe it makes sense here also to do some bounds checking when we get the userspace parameter. This patch just saturates the value. -Deepa