On Wed, Feb 27, 2019 at 11:44:31AM -0800, Florian Fainelli wrote:
> Drop switchdev_ops.switchdev_port_attr_set. Drop the uses of this field
> from all clients, which were migrated to use switchdev notification in
> the previous patches.
> 
> Add a new function switchdev_port_attr_notify() that sends the switchdev
> notifications SWITCHDEV_PORT_ATTR_SET and calls the blocking (process)
> notifier chain.
> 
> We have one odd case within net/bridge/br_switchdev.c with the
> SWITCHDEV_ATTR_ID_PORT_PRE_BRIDGE_FLAGS attribute identifier that
> requires executing from atomic context, we deal with that one
> specifically.
> 
> Drop __switchdev_port_attr_set() and update switchdev_port_attr_set()
> likewise.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Florian Fainelli <f.faine...@gmail.com>

Reviewed-by: Ido Schimmel <ido...@mellanox.com>

One small nit that you can address in a follow-up:

> @@ -67,12 +67,18 @@ int br_switchdev_set_port_flag(struct net_bridge_port *p,
>               .id = SWITCHDEV_ATTR_ID_PORT_PRE_BRIDGE_FLAGS,
>               .u.brport_flags = mask,
>       };
> +     struct switchdev_notifier_port_attr_info info = {
> +             .attr = &attr,
> +     };
>       int err;
>  
>       if (mask & ~BR_PORT_FLAGS_HW_OFFLOAD)
>               return 0;
>  
> -     err = switchdev_port_attr_set(p->dev, &attr);
> +     /* We run from atomic context here */
> +     err = call_switchdev_notifiers(SWITCHDEV_PORT_ATTR_SET, p->dev,
> +                                    &info.info, NULL);
> +     err = notifier_to_errno(err);
>       if (err == -EOPNOTSUPP)
>               return 0;

This check can be removed. The code below checks `err` and fails the
operation in case of error.

Reply via email to