Commit-ID:  2212684adff79e2704a2792ff46682afb9246fc8
Gitweb:     https://git.kernel.org/tip/2212684adff79e2704a2792ff46682afb9246fc8
Author:     Bart Van Assche <bvanass...@acm.org>
AuthorDate: Thu, 14 Feb 2019 15:00:48 -0800
Committer:  Ingo Molnar <mi...@kernel.org>
CommitDate: Thu, 28 Feb 2019 07:55:44 +0100

locking/lockdep: Introduce lockdep_next_lockchain() and lock_chain_count()

This patch does not change any functionality but makes the next patch in
this series easier to read.

Signed-off-by: Bart Van Assche <bvanass...@acm.org>
Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <pet...@infradead.org>
Cc: Andrew Morton <a...@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: Johannes Berg <johan...@sipsolutions.net>
Cc: Linus Torvalds <torva...@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: Paul E. McKenney <paul...@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <pet...@infradead.org>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <t...@linutronix.de>
Cc: Waiman Long <long...@redhat.com>
Cc: Will Deacon <will.dea...@arm.com>
Cc: johannes.b...@intel.com
Cc: t...@kernel.org
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20190214230058.196511-14-bvanass...@acm.org
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mi...@kernel.org>
---
 kernel/locking/lockdep.c           | 16 +++++++++++++++-
 kernel/locking/lockdep_internals.h |  3 ++-
 kernel/locking/lockdep_proc.c      | 12 ++++++------
 3 files changed, 23 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)

diff --git a/kernel/locking/lockdep.c b/kernel/locking/lockdep.c
index 2c6d0b67e7b6..753a9b758266 100644
--- a/kernel/locking/lockdep.c
+++ b/kernel/locking/lockdep.c
@@ -2096,7 +2096,7 @@ out_bug:
        return 0;
 }
 
-unsigned long nr_lock_chains;
+static unsigned long nr_lock_chains;
 struct lock_chain lock_chains[MAX_LOCKDEP_CHAINS];
 int nr_chain_hlocks;
 static u16 chain_hlocks[MAX_LOCKDEP_CHAIN_HLOCKS];
@@ -2230,6 +2230,20 @@ static int check_no_collision(struct task_struct *curr,
        return 1;
 }
 
+/*
+ * Given an index that is >= -1, return the index of the next lock chain.
+ * Return -2 if there is no next lock chain.
+ */
+long lockdep_next_lockchain(long i)
+{
+       return i + 1 < nr_lock_chains ? i + 1 : -2;
+}
+
+unsigned long lock_chain_count(void)
+{
+       return nr_lock_chains;
+}
+
 /*
  * Adds a dependency chain into chain hashtable. And must be called with
  * graph_lock held.
diff --git a/kernel/locking/lockdep_internals.h 
b/kernel/locking/lockdep_internals.h
index 2ebb9d0ea91c..d4c197425f68 100644
--- a/kernel/locking/lockdep_internals.h
+++ b/kernel/locking/lockdep_internals.h
@@ -100,7 +100,8 @@ struct lock_class *lock_chain_get_class(struct lock_chain 
*chain, int i);
 
 extern unsigned long nr_lock_classes;
 extern unsigned long nr_list_entries;
-extern unsigned long nr_lock_chains;
+long lockdep_next_lockchain(long i);
+unsigned long lock_chain_count(void);
 extern int nr_chain_hlocks;
 extern unsigned long nr_stack_trace_entries;
 
diff --git a/kernel/locking/lockdep_proc.c b/kernel/locking/lockdep_proc.c
index 3d31f9b0059e..9c49ec645d8b 100644
--- a/kernel/locking/lockdep_proc.c
+++ b/kernel/locking/lockdep_proc.c
@@ -104,18 +104,18 @@ static const struct seq_operations lockdep_ops = {
 #ifdef CONFIG_PROVE_LOCKING
 static void *lc_start(struct seq_file *m, loff_t *pos)
 {
+       if (*pos < 0)
+               return NULL;
+
        if (*pos == 0)
                return SEQ_START_TOKEN;
 
-       if (*pos - 1 < nr_lock_chains)
-               return lock_chains + (*pos - 1);
-
-       return NULL;
+       return lock_chains + (*pos - 1);
 }
 
 static void *lc_next(struct seq_file *m, void *v, loff_t *pos)
 {
-       (*pos)++;
+       *pos = lockdep_next_lockchain(*pos - 1) + 1;
        return lc_start(m, pos);
 }
 
@@ -268,7 +268,7 @@ static int lockdep_stats_show(struct seq_file *m, void *v)
 
 #ifdef CONFIG_PROVE_LOCKING
        seq_printf(m, " dependency chains:             %11lu [max: %lu]\n",
-                       nr_lock_chains, MAX_LOCKDEP_CHAINS);
+                       lock_chain_count(), MAX_LOCKDEP_CHAINS);
        seq_printf(m, " dependency chain hlocks:       %11d [max: %lu]\n",
                        nr_chain_hlocks, MAX_LOCKDEP_CHAIN_HLOCKS);
 #endif

Reply via email to