On 28/02/2019 23:26, Ulf Hansson wrote:
> On Thu, 28 Feb 2019 at 16:40, Daniel Lezcano <daniel.lezc...@linaro.org>
> wrote:
>>
>> On 28/02/2019 14:59, Ulf Hansson wrote:
>>> Instead of iterating through all the state nodes in DT, to find out how
>>> many states that needs to be allocated, let's use the number already known
>>> by the cpuidle driver. In this way we can drop the iteration altogether.
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Ulf Hansson <ulf.hans...@linaro.org>
>>> ---
>>> drivers/firmware/psci/psci.c | 25 ++++++++++++-------------
>>> 1 file changed, 12 insertions(+), 13 deletions(-)
>>>
>>> diff --git a/drivers/firmware/psci/psci.c b/drivers/firmware/psci/psci.c
>>> index d50b46a0528f..cbfc936d251c 100644
>>> --- a/drivers/firmware/psci/psci.c
>>> +++ b/drivers/firmware/psci/psci.c
>>> @@ -290,26 +290,20 @@ static int psci_dt_parse_state_node(struct
>>> device_node *np, u32 *state)
>>> static int psci_dt_cpu_init_idle(struct cpuidle_driver *drv,
>>> struct device_node *cpu_node, int cpu)
>>> {
>>> - int i, ret = 0, count = 0;
>>> + int i, ret = 0, num_state_nodes = drv->state_count - 1;
>>
>> why -1 ?
>
> Because of the WFI state. The cpuidle-arm driver always carries this
> state at index 0, which also is never used in
> psci_cpu_suspend_enter(), where the similar is taken into account.
>
> It's a bit of magic, so perhaps someone should post a patch that
> documents this a bit better in the code, wherever it makes sense.
Ah yes, right. The first state is already filled with the WFI state in
the cpuidle-arm.c driver and we must infer the index passed to
dt_init_idle_driver is 1 because of that.
Acked-by: Daniel Lezcano <daniel.lezc...@linaro.org>
[ ... ]
--
<http://www.linaro.org/> Linaro.org │ Open source software for ARM SoCs
Follow Linaro: <http://www.facebook.com/pages/Linaro> Facebook |
<http://twitter.com/#!/linaroorg> Twitter |
<http://www.linaro.org/linaro-blog/> Blog
