Jagan, The compatible is for the real hardware name as Maxime previously explained. The platform is described in the latter part. Please use: compatible = "oceanic,5205-5inmfd", "allwinner,sun50i-a64";
Thanks, Ryan Pannell Development Team Lead Oceanic Systems (UK) Ltd -----Original Message----- From: Jagan Teki <ja...@amarulasolutions.com> Sent: 06 March 2019 09:36 To: Maxime Ripard <maxime.rip...@bootlin.com> Cc: Ryan Pannell <r...@osukl.com>; Chen-Yu Tsai <w...@csie.org>; Rob Herring <robh...@kernel.org>; Mark Rutland <mark.rutl...@arm.com>; Michael Trimarchi <mich...@amarulasolutions.com>; linux-arm-kernel <linux-arm-ker...@lists.infradead.org>; devicetree <devicet...@vger.kernel.org>; linux-kernel <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>; linux-amar...@amarulasolutions.com Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] arm64: allwinner: a64: Add Oceanic A64-5inMFD initial support On Wed, Mar 6, 2019 at 2:57 PM Maxime Ripard <maxime.rip...@bootlin.com> wrote: > > On Tue, Mar 05, 2019 at 04:35:04PM +0000, Ryan Pannell wrote: > > We don't mind if it has to be: > > compatible = "oceanic,5inmfd", "allwinner,sun50i-a64"; > > > > However, to avoid confusion, might it be worth including the part number > > (We list this as '5205 5" MFD') so this would become: > > compatible = "oceanic,5205-5inmfd", "allwinner,sun50i-a64"; > > > > Perhaps this solves the issue. Please let me know thoughts. > > Yep, that works for me A64 instead of part-number 5205 seems less confused isn't it? or we need to give more priority with real hardware definition?
