On 3/6/19 6:29 AM, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
As John Stultz noticed, my y2038 syscall series caused a link failure when CONFIG_SYSVIPC is enabled but CONFIG_COMPAT is enabled:
is this supposed to be "CONFIG_SYSVIPC is disabled" to match the subject?
arch/arm64/kernel/sys32.o:(.rodata+0x960): undefined reference to `__arm64_compat_sys_old_semctl' arch/arm64/kernel/sys32.o:(.rodata+0x980): undefined reference to `__arm64_compat_sys_old_msgctl' arch/arm64/kernel/sys32.o:(.rodata+0x9a0): undefined reference to `__arm64_compat_sys_old_shmctl' Add the missing entries in kernel/sys_ni.c for the new system calls. Cc: Laura Abbott <labb...@redhat.com> Cc: John Stultz <john.stu...@linaro.org> Cc: Thomas Gleixner <t...@linutronix.de> Signed-off-by: Arnd Bergmann <a...@arndb.de> --- I'm about to send off my pull requests for arm-soc, so I'd just send another one with just this common from my y2038 tree. --- kernel/sys_ni.c | 3 +++ 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+) diff --git a/kernel/sys_ni.c b/kernel/sys_ni.c index 85e5ccec0955..62a6c8707799 100644 --- a/kernel/sys_ni.c +++ b/kernel/sys_ni.c @@ -202,6 +202,7 @@ COND_SYSCALL(msgget); COND_SYSCALL(old_msgctl); COND_SYSCALL(msgctl); COND_SYSCALL_COMPAT(msgctl); +COND_SYSCALL_COMPAT(old_msgctl); COND_SYSCALL(msgrcv); COND_SYSCALL_COMPAT(msgrcv); COND_SYSCALL(msgsnd); @@ -212,6 +213,7 @@ COND_SYSCALL(semget); COND_SYSCALL(old_semctl); COND_SYSCALL(semctl); COND_SYSCALL_COMPAT(semctl); +COND_SYSCALL_COMPAT(old_semctl); COND_SYSCALL(semtimedop); COND_SYSCALL(semtimedop_time32); COND_SYSCALL(semop); @@ -221,6 +223,7 @@ COND_SYSCALL(shmget); COND_SYSCALL(old_shmctl); COND_SYSCALL(shmctl); COND_SYSCALL_COMPAT(shmctl); +COND_SYSCALL_COMPAT(old_shmctl); COND_SYSCALL(shmat); COND_SYSCALL_COMPAT(shmat); COND_SYSCALL(shmdt);
