On Wed, Mar 06, 2019 at 12:35:43PM +0100, Steffen Klassert wrote: > On Wed, Mar 06, 2019 at 04:33:08PM +0900, Myungho Jung wrote: > > In esp4_gro_receive() and esp6_gro_receive(), secpath can be allocated > > without adding xfrm state to xvec. Then, sp->xvec[sp->len - 1] would > > fail and result in dereferencing invalid pointer in esp4_gso_segment() > > and esp6_gso_segment(). Reset secpath if xfrm function returns error. > > > > Reported-by: syzbot+b69368fd933c6c592...@syzkaller.appspotmail.com > > Signed-off-by: Myungho Jung <mhju...@gmail.com> > > The patch itself looks ok, but please add a 'Fixes' tag to > the commit message. > > Thanks!
Hi Steffen, Thanks for reviewing the change. I'll add fixes tag and resubmit it. Thanks, Myungho
