> So, we still have to wait for the exact explanation... > > Thanks very much Marcin! > > I think, there is this one possible for your testing yet?: > Subject: [patch] genirq: temporary fix for level-triggered IRQ resend > Date: Wed, 8 Aug 2007 13:00:37 +0200 > > If it's not a great problem it would be interesting to try this with > different CONFIG_HZ too e.g. you could start with 100 (I guess, you > tested very similar thing in 2.6.23-rc2 with 1000(?) already). > > Jean-Baptiste: you can skip/break testing of this 'experimental'
ok I was still testing on -rc2: Subject: [patch] genirq: temporary fix for level-triggered IRQ resend Date: Wed, 8 Aug 2007 13:00:37 +0200 For me after 1day 20hours, the network is still up, with more than 1To of network traffic. HZ was 1000, i restart with HZ=100. Jb - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
