On Thu, Mar 07, 2019 at 11:22:41AM +0100, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> pxa_cpufreq_init_voltages() is marked __init but usually inlined into
> the non-__init pxa_cpufreq_init() function. When building with clang,
> it can stay as a standalone function in a discarded section, and produce
> this warning:
>
> WARNING: vmlinux.o(.text+0x616a00): Section mismatch in reference from the
> function pxa_cpufreq_init() to the function
> .init.text:pxa_cpufreq_init_voltages()
> The function pxa_cpufreq_init() references
> the function __init pxa_cpufreq_init_voltages().
> This is often because pxa_cpufreq_init lacks a __init
> annotation or the annotation of pxa_cpufreq_init_voltages is wrong.
>
> Fixes: 50e77fcd790e ("ARM: pxa: remove __init from cpufreq_driver->init()")
> Signed-off-by: Arnd Bergmann <a...@arndb.de>
Reviewed-by: Nathan Chancellor <natechancel...@gmail.com>
> ---
> drivers/cpufreq/pxa2xx-cpufreq.c | 4 ++--
> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/cpufreq/pxa2xx-cpufreq.c
> b/drivers/cpufreq/pxa2xx-cpufreq.c
> index 46254e583982..74e0e0c20c46 100644
> --- a/drivers/cpufreq/pxa2xx-cpufreq.c
> +++ b/drivers/cpufreq/pxa2xx-cpufreq.c
> @@ -143,7 +143,7 @@ static int pxa_cpufreq_change_voltage(const struct
> pxa_freqs *pxa_freq)
> return ret;
> }
>
> -static void __init pxa_cpufreq_init_voltages(void)
> +static void pxa_cpufreq_init_voltages(void)
> {
> vcc_core = regulator_get(NULL, "vcc_core");
> if (IS_ERR(vcc_core)) {
> @@ -159,7 +159,7 @@ static int pxa_cpufreq_change_voltage(const struct
> pxa_freqs *pxa_freq)
> return 0;
> }
>
> -static void __init pxa_cpufreq_init_voltages(void) { }
> +static void pxa_cpufreq_init_voltages(void) { }
> #endif
>
> static void find_freq_tables(struct cpufreq_frequency_table **freq_table,
> --
> 2.20.0
>
