Parity page is incorrectly unmapped in finish_parity_scrub(), triggering
a reference counter bug on i386, i.e.:

 [ 157.662401] kernel BUG at mm/highmem.c:349!
 [ 157.666725] invalid opcode: 0000 [#1] SMP PTI

The reason is that kunmap(p_page) was completely left out, so we never
did an unmap for the p_page and the loop unmapping the rbio page was
iterating over the wrong number of stripes: unmapping should be done
with nr_data instead of rbio->real_stripes.

Test case to reproduce the bug:

 - create a raid5 btrfs filesystem:
   # mkfs.btrfs -m raid5 -d raid5 /dev/sdb /dev/sdc /dev/sdd /dev/sde

 - mount it:
   # mount /dev/sdb /mnt

 - run btrfs scrub in a loop:
   # while :; do btrfs scrub start -BR /mnt; done

BugLink: https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1812845
Reviewed-by: Johannes Thumshirn <jthumsh...@suse.de>
Signed-off-by: Andrea Righi <andrea.ri...@canonical.com>
---
Changes in v2:
 - added a better description about this fix (thanks to Johannes)

 fs/btrfs/raid56.c | 3 ++-
 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/fs/btrfs/raid56.c b/fs/btrfs/raid56.c
index 1869ba8e5981..67a6f7d47402 100644
--- a/fs/btrfs/raid56.c
+++ b/fs/btrfs/raid56.c
@@ -2430,8 +2430,9 @@ static noinline void finish_parity_scrub(struct 
btrfs_raid_bio *rbio,
                        bitmap_clear(rbio->dbitmap, pagenr, 1);
                kunmap(p);
 
-               for (stripe = 0; stripe < rbio->real_stripes; stripe++)
+               for (stripe = 0; stripe < nr_data; stripe++)
                        kunmap(page_in_rbio(rbio, stripe, pagenr, 0));
+               kunmap(p_page);
        }
 
        __free_page(p_page);
-- 
2.19.1

Reply via email to