Hi,

Good catch !
Le 14/03/2019 à 08:17, Kangjie Lu a écrit :
> In case dmaengine_prep_dma_cyclic fails, the fix return a proper
> error code to avoid NULL pointer dereference.
> 
you could add:
Fixes: 34df42f59a60 ("serial: at91: add rx dma support")
So that -stable branches get this.

> Signed-off-by: Kangjie Lu <k...@umn.edu>
> ---
>  drivers/tty/serial/atmel_serial.c | 12 ++++++++++--
>  1 file changed, 10 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/tty/serial/atmel_serial.c 
> b/drivers/tty/serial/atmel_serial.c
> index 05147fe24343..cf560d05008c 100644
> --- a/drivers/tty/serial/atmel_serial.c
> +++ b/drivers/tty/serial/atmel_serial.c
> @@ -1237,8 +1237,10 @@ static int atmel_prepare_rx_dma(struct uart_port *port)
>       dma_cap_set(DMA_CYCLIC, mask);
>  
>       atmel_port->chan_rx = dma_request_slave_channel(mfd_dev, "rx");
> -     if (atmel_port->chan_rx == NULL)
> +     if (atmel_port->chan_rx == NULL) {
> +             ret = -EINVAL;
>               goto chan_err;
> +     }
>       dev_info(port->dev, "using %s for rx DMA transfers\n",
>               dma_chan_name(atmel_port->chan_rx));
>  
> @@ -1257,6 +1259,7 @@ static int atmel_prepare_rx_dma(struct uart_port *port)
>  
>       if (!nent) {
>               dev_dbg(port->dev, "need to release resource of dma\n");
> +             ret = -EINVAL;
>               goto chan_err;
>       } else {
>               dev_dbg(port->dev, "%s: mapped %d@%p to %pad\n", __func__,
> @@ -1288,6 +1291,11 @@ static int atmel_prepare_rx_dma(struct uart_port *port)
>                                        sg_dma_len(&atmel_port->sg_rx)/2,
>                                        DMA_DEV_TO_MEM,
>                                        DMA_PREP_INTERRUPT);
> +     if (!desc) {
> +             dev_err(port->dev, "Preparing DMA cyclic failed\n");
> +             ret = -ENOMEM;
IMHO, we don't really know why dmaengine_prep_dma_cyclic() failed, it
could be because it's already in use, or bad value, or...
(and anyway, we just check if the return value is < 0 in atmel _startup.)
Is there a specific reason you choose -ENOMEM ?
If not, maybe keeping this patch smaller with a simple dev_err()+goto
here would be a better choice.

> +             goto chan_err;
> +     }
>       desc->callback = atmel_complete_rx_dma;
>       desc->callback_param = port;
>       atmel_port->desc_rx = desc;
> @@ -1300,7 +1308,7 @@ static int atmel_prepare_rx_dma(struct uart_port *port)
>       atmel_port->use_dma_rx = 0;
>       if (atmel_port->chan_rx)
>               atmel_release_rx_dma(port);
> -     return -EINVAL;
> +     return ret;
>  }
>  
>  static void atmel_uart_timer_callback(struct timer_list *t)
> 

Thanks !

Richard.

Reply via email to