This function returns an error if a child interrupt controller calls
irq_chip_set_wake_parent() but that parent interrupt controller has the
IRQCHIP_SKIP_SET_WAKE flag. Let's return 0 for success instead because
there isn't anything to do.

There's also the possibility that a parent indicates that we should skip
it, but the grandparent has an .irq_set_wake callback. Let's iterate
through the parent chain as long as the IRQCHIP_SKIP_SET_WAKE flag isn't
set so we can find the first parent that needs to handle the wake
configuration. This fixes a problem on my Qualcomm sdm845 device where
I'm trying to enable wake on an irq from the gpio controller that's a
child of the qcom pdc interrupt controller. The qcom pdc interrupt
controller has the IRQCHIP_SKIP_SET_WAKE flag set, and so does the
grandparent (ARM GIC), causing this function to return a failure because
the parent controller doesn't have the .irq_set_wake callback set.

Cc: Lina Iyer <il...@codeaurora.org>
Cc: Marc Zyngier <marc.zyng...@arm.com>
Signed-off-by: Stephen Boyd <swb...@chromium.org>
---
 kernel/irq/chip.c | 8 +++++++-
 1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/kernel/irq/chip.c b/kernel/irq/chip.c
index 3faef4a77f71..280d612ba71b 100644
--- a/kernel/irq/chip.c
+++ b/kernel/irq/chip.c
@@ -1448,7 +1448,13 @@ int irq_chip_set_vcpu_affinity_parent(struct irq_data 
*data, void *vcpu_info)
  */
 int irq_chip_set_wake_parent(struct irq_data *data, unsigned int on)
 {
-       data = data->parent_data;
+       for (data = data->parent_data; data; data = data->parent_data)
+               if (!(data->chip->flags & IRQCHIP_SKIP_SET_WAKE))
+                       break;
+
+       if (!data)
+               return 0;
+
        if (data->chip->irq_set_wake)
                return data->chip->irq_set_wake(data, on);
 
-- 
Sent by a computer through tubes

Reply via email to