On Fri, 15 Mar 2019, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> On Fri, Mar 15, 2019 at 03:44:38AM +0000, chenj...@huawei.com wrote:
> > From: chen jie <chenj...@huawei.com>
>
> > [11542.215247] [<c017b1d4>] (cmpxchg_futex_value_locked) from [<c017da50>]
> > (handle_futex_death+0x78/0xcc)
> > [11542.215259] [<c017da50>] (handle_futex_death) from [<c017dba8>]
> > (exit_robust_list+0x104/0x160)
> > [11542.215273] [<c017dba8>] (exit_robust_list) from [<c011b40c>]
> > (mm_release+0x1c/0x108)
> > [11542.215287] [<c011b40c>] (mm_release) from [<c011f9a4>]
> > (do_exit+0x218/0x9a4)
> > [11542.215299] [<c011f9a4>] (do_exit) from [<c0120250>]
> > (do_group_exit+0xac/0xf4)
> > [11542.215311] [<c0120250>] (do_group_exit) from [<c01202a8>]
> > (__wake_up_parent+0x0/0x18)
>
> > Signed-off-by: chen jie <chenj...@huawei.com>
>
> Reviewed-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <pet...@infradead.org>
>
> However, should there not also be alignment tests on set_robust_list()?
>
> Also; do_futex() should probably check uaddr and uaddr2.
>
> That is; why aren't there any alignment tests anywhere? Or am I just
> gone blind?
uaddrs for the futex syscalls are checked in get_futex_key().
Thanks,
tglx
