5.0-stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know.
------------------
From: Stefano Brivio <sbri...@redhat.com>
[ Upstream commit ad6c9986bcb627c7c22b8f9e9a934becc27df87c ]
If we receive a packet while deleting a VXLAN device, there's a chance
vxlan_rcv() is called at the same time as vxlan_dellink(). This is fine,
except that vxlan_dellink() should never ever touch stuff that's still in
use, such as the GRO cells list.
Otherwise, vxlan_rcv() crashes while queueing packets via
gro_cells_receive().
Move the gro_cells_destroy() to vxlan_uninit(), which runs after the RCU
grace period is elapsed and nothing needs the gro_cells anymore.
This is now done in the same way as commit 8e816df87997 ("geneve: Use GRO
cells infrastructure.") originally implemented for GENEVE.
Reported-by: Jianlin Shi <ji...@redhat.com>
Fixes: 58ce31cca1ff ("vxlan: GRO support at tunnel layer")
Signed-off-by: Stefano Brivio <sbri...@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Sabrina Dubroca <s...@queasysnail.net>
Reviewed-by: Eric Dumazet <eduma...@google.com>
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <da...@davemloft.net>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gre...@linuxfoundation.org>
---
drivers/net/vxlan.c | 3 ++-
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
--- a/drivers/net/vxlan.c
+++ b/drivers/net/vxlan.c
@@ -2693,6 +2693,8 @@ static void vxlan_uninit(struct net_devi
{
struct vxlan_dev *vxlan = netdev_priv(dev);
+ gro_cells_destroy(&vxlan->gro_cells);
+
vxlan_fdb_delete_default(vxlan, vxlan->cfg.vni);
free_percpu(dev->tstats);
@@ -3794,7 +3796,6 @@ static void vxlan_dellink(struct net_dev
vxlan_flush(vxlan, true);
- gro_cells_destroy(&vxlan->gro_cells);
list_del(&vxlan->next);
unregister_netdevice_queue(dev, head);
}
