(previously send on 09-Aug-2007 20:47)
Hi,
The Coverity checker noticed that we may overrun a statically allocated
array in drivers/scsi/lpfc/lpfc_sli.c::lpfc_sli_hbqbuf_find().
The case is this; In 'struct lpfc_hba' we have
#define LPFC_MAX_HBQS 4
...
struct lpfc_hba {
...
struct hbq_s hbqs[LPFC_MAX_HBQS];
...
};
But then in lpfc_sli_hbqbuf_find() we have this code
hbqno = tag >> 16;
if (hbqno > LPFC_MAX_HBQS)
return NULL;
if 'hbqno' ends up as exactely 4, then we won't return, and then this
list_for_each_entry(d_buf, &phba->hbqs[hbqno].hbq_buffer_list, list) {
will cause an overflow of the statically allocated array at index 4,
since the valid indices are only 0-3.
I propose this patch, that simply changes the 'hbqno > LPFC_MAX_HBQS'
into 'hbqno >= LPFC_MAX_HBQS' as a possible fix.
Signed-off-by: Jesper Juhl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Acked-by: James Smart <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
---
drivers/scsi/lpfc/lpfc_sli.c | 2 +-
1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/scsi/lpfc/lpfc_sli.c b/drivers/scsi/lpfc/lpfc_sli.c
index ce5ff2b..e5337ad 100644
--- a/drivers/scsi/lpfc/lpfc_sli.c
+++ b/drivers/scsi/lpfc/lpfc_sli.c
@@ -675,7 +675,7 @@ lpfc_sli_hbqbuf_find(struct lpfc_hba *phba, uint32_t tag)
uint32_t hbqno;
hbqno = tag >> 16;
- if (hbqno > LPFC_MAX_HBQS)
+ if (hbqno >= LPFC_MAX_HBQS)
return NULL;
list_for_each_entry(d_buf, &phba->hbqs[hbqno].hbq_buffer_list, list) {
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
