On 08/12/2007 10:32 PM, James Bottomley wrote:
On Sun, 2007-08-12 at 07:58 +0100, Al Viro wrote:
On Sun, Aug 12, 2007 at 03:21:57AM +0200, Rene Herman wrote:
@@ -2609,13 +2609,13 @@ static void do_cciss_request(request_queue_t *q)
} else {
c->Request.CDBLen = 16;
c->Request.CDB[1]= 0;
- c->Request.CDB[2]= (start_blk >> 56) & 0xff; //MSB
- c->Request.CDB[3]= (start_blk >> 48) & 0xff;
- c->Request.CDB[4]= (start_blk >> 40) & 0xff;
- c->Request.CDB[5]= (start_blk >> 32) & 0xff;
- c->Request.CDB[6]= (start_blk >> 24) & 0xff;
- c->Request.CDB[7]= (start_blk >> 16) & 0xff;
- c->Request.CDB[8]= (start_blk >> 8) & 0xff;
+ c->Request.CDB[2]= ((u64)start_blk >> 56) & 0xff; //MSB
+ c->Request.CDB[3]= ((u64)start_blk >> 48) & 0xff;
+ c->Request.CDB[4]= ((u64)start_blk >> 40) & 0xff;
+ c->Request.CDB[5]= ((u64)start_blk >> 32) & 0xff;
+ c->Request.CDB[6]= ((u64)start_blk >> 24) & 0xff;
+ c->Request.CDB[7]= ((u64)start_blk >> 16) & 0xff;
+ c->Request.CDB[8]= ((u64)start_blk >> 8) & 0xff;
put_unaligned(cpu_to_be64(start_blk), &c->Request.CDB[2]);
which is what's happening here anyway.
Well ... this was debated a while ago ad nauseam:
http://marc.info/?t=117699555300010
The main objection to what you propose is that it forces the u64
coercion even in the 32 bit start_blk case. The preferred solution as a
result of that debate was simply to us a macro Andrew introduced:
upper_32_bits()
Which will silently replace zero in the non LBD case. I actually
thought this had already been done.
I see. Will assume it's somewhere in the pipeline.
Rene.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
