18.03.2019 19:17, Steve Twiss пишет:
> During several error paths in the function
> regulator_set_voltage_unlocked() the value of 'ret' can take on negative
> error values. However, in calls that go through the 'goto out' statement,
> this return value is lost and return 0 is used instead, indicating a
> 'pass'.
> 
> There are several cases where this function should legitimately return a
> fail instead of a pass: one such case includes constraints check during
> voltage selection in the call to regulator_check_voltage(), which can
> have -EINVAL for the case when an unsupported voltage is incorrectly
> requested. In that case, -22 is expected as the return value, not 0.
> 
> Fixes: 9243a195be7a ("regulator: core: Change voltage setting path")
> Cc: stable <[email protected]>
> Signed-off-by: Steve Twiss <[email protected]>
> ---
>  drivers/regulator/core.c | 11 ++++-------
>  1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/regulator/core.c b/drivers/regulator/core.c
> index 68473d0..968dcd9 100644
> --- a/drivers/regulator/core.c
> +++ b/drivers/regulator/core.c
> @@ -3322,15 +3322,12 @@ static int regulator_set_voltage_unlocked(struct 
> regulator *regulator,
>  
>       /* for not coupled regulators this will just set the voltage */
>       ret = regulator_balance_voltage(rdev, state);
> -     if (ret < 0)
> -             goto out2;
> +     if (ret < 0) {
> +             voltage->min_uV = old_min_uV;
> +             voltage->max_uV = old_max_uV;
> +     }
>  
>  out:
> -     return 0;
> -out2:
> -     voltage->min_uV = old_min_uV;
> -     voltage->max_uV = old_max_uV;
> -
>       return ret;
>  }
>  
> 

Reviewed-by: Dmitry Osipenko <[email protected]>

Reply via email to