> -----Original Message-----
> From: Aisheng Dong
> Sent: 2019年3月15日 21:40
> To: Peng Fan <peng....@nxp.com>; shawn...@kernel.org;
> s.ha...@pengutronix.de; ker...@pengutronix.de; feste...@gmail.com;
> dl-linux-imx <linux-...@nxp.com>; Anson Huang <anson.hu...@nxp.com>;
> a...@arndb.de; linux-arm-ker...@lists.infradead.org;
> linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
> Cc: van.free...@gmail.com
> Subject: RE: [PATCH 2/2] ARM: imx: mach-imx7ulp: warn when
> imx_soc_device_init fail
> 
> [...]
> 
> > > > Follow other i.MX6/7 machince code to check return value of
> > > > imx_soc_device_init and warn when fail.
> > > >
> > > > Also drop of_platform_default_populate, because
> > > > "arch_initcall_sync(of_platform_default_populate_init);" could be
> > > > used to populate the device tree.
> > > >
> > >
> > > This could be in separate patch.
> >
> > I'll do it in v2 after we agree the change in the first patch.
> >
> 
> I think imx7ulp does not have the issue in patch 1.

Missed to reply you.
So do you agree to split this patch into two
patches ? or leave the code as it is?

The first is follow other i.mx6/7 to check return value of
imx_soc_device_init. 
The second is drop the call to of_platform_default_populate.

Thanks,
Peng

> 
> Regards
> Dong Aisheng
> 
> > >
> > > > Signed-off-by: Peng Fan <peng....@nxp.com>
> > > > ---
> > > >  arch/arm/mach-imx/mach-imx7ulp.c | 7 ++++++-
> > > >  1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> > > >
> > > > diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-imx/mach-imx7ulp.c
> > > > b/arch/arm/mach-imx/mach-imx7ulp.c
> > > > index 11ac71aaf965..6d823f05d9aa 100644
> > > > --- a/arch/arm/mach-imx/mach-imx7ulp.c
> > > > +++ b/arch/arm/mach-imx/mach-imx7ulp.c
> > > > @@ -53,11 +53,16 @@ static void __init imx7ulp_set_revision(void)
> > > >
> > > >  static void __init imx7ulp_init_machine(void)  {
> > > > +       struct device *soc_dev;
> > > > +
> > > > +       soc_dev = imx_soc_device_init();
> > > > +       if (soc_dev == NULL)
> > > > +               pr_warn("failed to initialize soc device\n");
> > > > +
> > >
> > > Should this be under set revision?
> >
> > Just follow other i.MX6/7 platforms practice, I could move this under
> > set revision in v2 if you prefer.
> >
> > Thanks,
> > Peng.
> >
> > >
> > > Regards
> > > Dong Aisheng
> > >
> > > >         imx7ulp_pm_init();
> > > >
> > > >         mxc_set_cpu_type(MXC_CPU_IMX7ULP);
> > > >         imx7ulp_set_revision();
> > > > -       of_platform_default_populate(NULL, NULL, imx_soc_device_init());
> > > >  }
> > > >
> > > >  static const char *const imx7ulp_dt_compat[] __initconst = {
> > > > --
> > > > 2.16.4

Reply via email to