On Mon, Mar 25, 2019 at 01:51:18PM +0200, Andy Shevchenko wrote: > On Mon, Mar 25, 2019 at 10:31:13AM +0100, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: > > On Fri, Mar 22, 2019 at 2:47 PM Thomas Preston > > <thomas.pres...@codethink.co.uk> wrote: > > > > > > Add an example for the magic PRP0001 device ID which allows matching > > > ACPI devices against drivers using OF Device Tree compatible property. > > > It wasn't clear to me that PRP0001 could be used in _CID. > > > > Mika, Andy, can you have a look at this, please? > > Good to me, > Reviewed-by: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevche...@linux.intel.com> > > Though one thing I would like to add (not directly related to the patch > per se), i.e. it would be nice to keep such examples under meta-acpi [1] > umbrella as a database for such excerpts. > > Thomas, can you do that? > > [1]: https://github.com/westeri/meta-acpi > > > > + Name (_HID, "TITMP75") /* _HID will appear in sysfs */
Sorry for not noticing earlier. Is this an official ID for the chip? We discourage people to invent ACPI IDs on their own. -- With Best Regards, Andy Shevchenko
