On Mon, Mar 25, 2019 at 6:00 AM Arnd Bergmann <a...@arndb.de> wrote:
>
> BUG_ON(1) leads to bogus warnings from clang when
> CONFIG_PROFILE_ANNOTATED_BRANCHES is set:
>
> fs/ext4/inode.c:544:4: error: variable 'retval' is used uninitialized
> whenever 'if' condition is false
> [-Werror,-Wsometimes-uninitialized]
> BUG_ON(1);
> ^~~~~~~~~
> include/asm-generic/bug.h:61:36: note: expanded from macro 'BUG_ON'
> ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
> include/linux/compiler.h:48:23: note: expanded from macro 'unlikely'
> ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
> fs/ext4/inode.c:591:6: note: uninitialized use occurs here
> if (retval > 0 && map->m_flags & EXT4_MAP_MAPPED) {
> ^~~~~~
> fs/ext4/inode.c:544:4: note: remove the 'if' if its condition is always true
> BUG_ON(1);
> ^
> include/asm-generic/bug.h:61:32: note: expanded from macro 'BUG_ON'
> ^
> fs/ext4/inode.c:502:12: note: initialize the variable 'retval' to silence
> this warning
>
> Change it to BUG() so clang can see that this code path can never
> continue.
Thanks for the patch; I suspect the definition of `unlikely` is tricky
to "see through." This is more concise about what we want to do in
these cases anyways.
Reviewed-by: Nick Desaulniers <ndesaulni...@google.com>
>
> Signed-off-by: Arnd Bergmann <a...@arndb.de>
> ---
> fs/ext4/extents_status.c | 4 ++--
> fs/ext4/inode.c | 4 ++--
> 2 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/fs/ext4/extents_status.c b/fs/ext4/extents_status.c
> index 2b439afafe13..023a3eb3afa3 100644
> --- a/fs/ext4/extents_status.c
> +++ b/fs/ext4/extents_status.c
> @@ -711,7 +711,7 @@ static void ext4_es_insert_extent_ind_check(struct inode
> *inode,
> * We don't need to check unwritten extent because
> * indirect-based file doesn't have it.
> */
> - BUG_ON(1);
> + BUG();
> }
> } else if (retval == 0) {
> if (ext4_es_is_written(es)) {
> @@ -780,7 +780,7 @@ static int __es_insert_extent(struct inode *inode, struct
> extent_status *newes)
> }
> p = &(*p)->rb_right;
> } else {
> - BUG_ON(1);
> + BUG();
> return -EINVAL;
> }
> }
> diff --git a/fs/ext4/inode.c b/fs/ext4/inode.c
> index b32a57bc5d5d..190f0478582a 100644
> --- a/fs/ext4/inode.c
> +++ b/fs/ext4/inode.c
> @@ -541,7 +541,7 @@ int ext4_map_blocks(handle_t *handle, struct inode *inode,
> map->m_len = retval;
> retval = 0;
> } else {
> - BUG_ON(1);
> + BUG();
> }
> #ifdef ES_AGGRESSIVE_TEST
> ext4_map_blocks_es_recheck(handle, inode, map,
> @@ -1876,7 +1876,7 @@ static int ext4_da_map_blocks(struct inode *inode,
> sector_t iblock,
> else if (ext4_es_is_unwritten(&es))
> map->m_flags |= EXT4_MAP_UNWRITTEN;
> else
> - BUG_ON(1);
> + BUG();
>
> #ifdef ES_AGGRESSIVE_TEST
> ext4_map_blocks_es_recheck(NULL, inode, map, &orig_map, 0);
> --
> 2.20.0
>
--
Thanks,
~Nick Desaulniers
