On Mon, 1 Apr 2019, Peter Zijlstra wrote:

> On Sun, Mar 31, 2019 at 11:40:24PM +0200, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
> > --- a/arch/x86/include/asm/page_64_types.h
> > +++ b/arch/x86/include/asm/page_64_types.h
> > @@ -25,11 +25,14 @@
> >  #define IRQ_STACK_ORDER (2 + KASAN_STACK_ORDER)
> >  #define IRQ_STACK_SIZE (PAGE_SIZE << IRQ_STACK_ORDER)
> >  
> > -#define DOUBLEFAULT_STACK 1
> > -#define NMI_STACK 2
> > -#define DEBUG_STACK 3
> > -#define MCE_STACK 4
> > -#define N_EXCEPTION_STACKS 4  /* hw limit: 7 */
> > +/*
> > + * The index for the tss.ist[] array. The hardware limit is 7 entries.
> > + */
> > +#define    DOUBLEFAULT_IST         0
> > +#define    NMI_IST                 1
> > +#define    DEBUG_IST               2
> > +#define    MCE_IST                 3
> > +#define    N_EXCEPTION_STACKS      4
> 
> Would it make sense to use an enum here?

Yes, but ASM code hates enums. We could solve that by moving it to a
different header and exposing the necessary define via asm-offsets. I'll
have a look.

Thanks,

        tglx

Reply via email to