On Mon, Apr 01, 2019 at 10:21:58PM +0800, Muchun Song wrote: > Thanks for your reply. In fact, I didn't hit any problem. I just read the > code > and found the problem. I see max_mapnr is to only be used in the > generic pfn_valid(). > As you said, we do not use it on arm64. So in a sense, the patch is > meaningless. > > But I think since it is a problem, why not fix it (Even if max_mapnr > is not be used)? > What is your opinion?
I'm ok with fixing, only that it's not urgent. Will can pick it up for the 5.2 merging window. Reviewed-by: Catalin Marinas <catalin.mari...@arm.com>
