On Mon, Mar 25, 2019 at 01:57:57PM +0100, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> When lockdep is enabled, and -Wuninitialized warnings are enabled,
> clang produces a silly warning for every file we compile:
> 
> In file included from  kernel/sched/fair.c:23:
>  kernel/sched/sched.h:1094:15: error: variable 'cookie' is uninitialized when 
> used here [-Werror,-Wuninitialized]
>         rf->cookie = lockdep_pin_lock(&rq->lock);
>                      ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
>  include/linux/lockdep.h:474:60: note: expanded from macro 'lockdep_pin_lock'
>  #define lockdep_pin_lock(l)                     ({ struct pin_cookie cookie; 
> cookie; })
>                                                                              
> ^~~~~~
>  kernel/sched/sched.h:1094:15: note: variable 'cookie' is declared here
>  include/linux/lockdep.h:474:34: note: expanded from macro 'lockdep_pin_lock'
>  #define lockdep_pin_lock(l)                     ({ struct pin_cookie cookie; 
> cookie; })
>                                                    ^
> As the 'struct pin_cookie' structure is empty in this configuration,
> there is no need to initialize it for correctness, but it also
> does not hurt to set it to an empty structure, so do that to
> avoid the warning.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Arnd Bergmann <[email protected]>
> ---
>  include/linux/lockdep.h | 2 +-
>  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
> 
> diff --git a/include/linux/lockdep.h b/include/linux/lockdep.h
> index 79c3873d58ac..31d7549933eb 100644
> --- a/include/linux/lockdep.h
> +++ b/include/linux/lockdep.h
> @@ -471,7 +471,7 @@ struct pin_cookie { };
>  
>  #define NIL_COOKIE (struct pin_cookie){ }
>  
> -#define lockdep_pin_lock(l)                  ({ struct pin_cookie cookie; 
> cookie; })
> +#define lockdep_pin_lock(l)                  ({ struct pin_cookie cookie = 
> {}; cookie; })
>  #define lockdep_repin_lock(l, c)             do { (void)(l); (void)(c); } 
> while (0)
>  #define lockdep_unpin_lock(l, c)             do { (void)(l); (void)(c); } 
> while (0)

Acked-by: Will Deacon <[email protected]>

Will

Reply via email to