On Wed, Apr 03, 2019 at 01:56:09PM +0800, wen.yan...@zte.com.cn wrote:
> > > The call to of_get_next_child returns a node pointer with refcount
> > > incremented thus it must be explicitly decremented after the last
> > > usage.
> > >
> > > Detected by coccinelle with the following warnings:
> > > ./arch/arm64/kernel/cpu_ops.c:102:1-7: ERROR: missing of_node_put;
> > > acquired a node pointer with refcount incremented on line 69, but without
> > > a corresponding object release within this function.
> > >
> > > Signed-off-by: Wen Yang <wen.yan...@zte.com.cn>
> > > Reviewed-by: Florian Fainelli <f.faine...@gmail.com>
> > > Cc: Catalin Marinas <catalin.mari...@arm.com>
> > > Cc: Will Deacon <will.dea...@arm.com>
> > > Cc: linux-arm-ker...@lists.infradead.org
> > > Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
> > > ---
> > > v2->v1: add a missing space between "adding" and "missing"
> > >
> > > arch/arm64/kernel/cpu_ops.c | 1 +
> > > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
> > >
> > > diff --git a/arch/arm64/kernel/cpu_ops.c b/arch/arm64/kernel/cpu_ops.c
> > > index ea00124..00f8b86 100644
> > > --- a/arch/arm64/kernel/cpu_ops.c
> > > +++ b/arch/arm64/kernel/cpu_ops.c
> > > @@ -85,6 +85,7 @@ static const char *__init cpu_read_enable_method(int
> > > cpu)
> > > pr_err("%pOF: missing enable-method property\n",
> > > dn);
> > > }
> > > + of_node_put(dn);
> > > } else {
> > > enable_method = acpi_get_enable_method(cpu);
> > > if (!enable_method) {
> >
> > Looks about right to me:
> >
> > Acked-by: Will Deacon <will.dea...@arm.com>
> >
> > How do you plan to get this upstream? Can we just pick this one up via
> > arm64?
>
> Ok, thank you.
> We are very happy to know that it is useful.
Ok, I picked it up.
Will
