Hi,

On Mon, Mar 18, 2019 at 06:32:35PM +0100, Hans de Goede wrote:
> Hi,
> 
> On 18-03-19 17:14, Gustavo A. R. Silva wrote:
> > Currently there is no check on platform_get_irq() return value
> > in case it fails, hence never actually reporting any errors and
> > causing unexpected behavior when using such value as argument
> > for function regmap_irq_get_virq().
> > 
> > Fix this by adding a proper check, a message reporting any errors
> > and returning *pirq*
> > 
> > Addresses-Coverity-ID: 1443940 ("Improper use of negative value")
> > Fixes: 843735b788a4 ("power: axp288_charger: axp288 charger driver")
> > Cc: [email protected]
> > Signed-off-by: Gustavo A. R. Silva <[email protected]>
> > ---
> >   drivers/power/supply/axp288_charger.c | 4 ++++
> >   1 file changed, 4 insertions(+)
> > 
> > diff --git a/drivers/power/supply/axp288_charger.c 
> > b/drivers/power/supply/axp288_charger.c
> > index f8c6da9277b3..00b961890a38 100644
> > --- a/drivers/power/supply/axp288_charger.c
> > +++ b/drivers/power/supply/axp288_charger.c
> > @@ -833,6 +833,10 @@ static int axp288_charger_probe(struct platform_device 
> > *pdev)
> >     /* Register charger interrupts */
> >     for (i = 0; i < CHRG_INTR_END; i++) {
> >             pirq = platform_get_irq(info->pdev, i);
> > +           if (pirq < 0) {
> > +                   dev_err(&pdev->dev, "Failed to get IRQ: %d\n", pirq);
> > +                   return pirq;
> > +           }
> >             info->irq[i] = regmap_irq_get_virq(info->regmap_irqc, pirq);
> >             if (info->irq[i] < 0) {
> >                     dev_warn(&info->pdev->dev,
> > 
> 
> Patch looks good to me:
> 
> Reviewed-by: Hans de Goede <[email protected]>

Thanks, queued.

-- Sebastian

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: PGP signature

Reply via email to