On 2019/4/8 1:34, Andy Lutomirski wrote: > On Fri, Apr 5, 2019 at 12:32 PM Thomas Gleixner <[email protected]> wrote: >> >> On Sun, 24 Feb 2019, Aubrey Li wrote: >> >>> The architecture specific information of the running processes could >>> be useful to the userland. Add support to examine process architecture >>> specific information externally. >>> >>> Signed-off-by: Aubrey Li <[email protected]> >>> Cc: Peter Zijlstra <[email protected]> >>> Cc: Andi Kleen <[email protected]> >>> Cc: Tim Chen <[email protected]> >>> Cc: Dave Hansen <[email protected]> >>> Cc: Arjan van de Ven <[email protected]> >> >> This really lacks >> >> Cc: Linux API <[email protected]> >> Cc: Alexey Dobriyan <[email protected]> >> Cc: Andrew Morton <[email protected]> >> >> Cc'ed now. >> > > I certainly understand why you want to expose this info, but would it > make more sense to instead add an arch_status file in /proc with > architecture-specific info? Or maybe an x86_status field for x86 > status, etc. >
I tried this, but no other architecture showed interest in arch_status under /proc. Thanks, -Aubrey
