On 2019/4/8 1:34, Andy Lutomirski wrote: > On Fri, Apr 5, 2019 at 12:32 PM Thomas Gleixner <t...@linutronix.de> wrote: >> >> On Sun, 24 Feb 2019, Aubrey Li wrote: >> >>> The architecture specific information of the running processes could >>> be useful to the userland. Add support to examine process architecture >>> specific information externally. >>> >>> Signed-off-by: Aubrey Li <aubrey...@linux.intel.com> >>> Cc: Peter Zijlstra <pet...@infradead.org> >>> Cc: Andi Kleen <a...@linux.intel.com> >>> Cc: Tim Chen <tim.c.c...@linux.intel.com> >>> Cc: Dave Hansen <dave.han...@intel.com> >>> Cc: Arjan van de Ven <ar...@linux.intel.com> >> >> This really lacks >> >> Cc: Linux API <linux-...@vger.kernel.org> >> Cc: Alexey Dobriyan <adobri...@gmail.com> >> Cc: Andrew Morton <a...@linux-foundation.org> >> >> Cc'ed now. >> > > I certainly understand why you want to expose this info, but would it > make more sense to instead add an arch_status file in /proc with > architecture-specific info? Or maybe an x86_status field for x86 > status, etc. >
I tried this, but no other architecture showed interest in arch_status under /proc. Thanks, -Aubrey
