On Mon, 8 Apr 2019 13:01:21 +0300
Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevche...@linux.intel.com> wrote:
> On Mon, Apr 08, 2019 at 09:14:58AM +0100, Jonathan Cameron wrote:
> > On Mon, 8 Apr 2019 13:02:12 +1000
> > Stephen Rothwell <s...@canb.auug.org.au> wrote:
> >
> > > Hi all,
> > >
> > > Today's linux-next merge of the staging tree got a conflict in:
> > >
> > > drivers/iio/industrialio-buffer.c
> > >
> > > between commit:
> > >
> > > 20ea39ef9f2f ("iio: Fix scan mask selection")
> > >
> > > from the staging.current tree and commit:
> > >
> > > 3862828a903d ("iio: buffer: Switch to bitmap_zalloc()")
> > >
> > > from the staging tree.
> > >
> > > I fixed it up (I just used the staging tree version) and can carry the
> > > fix as necessary. This is now fixed as far as linux-next is concerned,
> > > but any non trivial conflicts should be mentioned to your upstream
> > > maintainer when your tree is submitted for merging. You may also want
> > > to consider cooperating with the maintainer of the conflicting tree to
> > > minimise any particularly complex conflicts.
> > >
> > Thanks Stephen,
> >
> > That is the correct resolution.
>
> I think it still misses the following fix:
>
Hi Andy,
Is that actually a problem given it's copied over from buffer->scan_mask just
after allocation?
The two masks are the same length so I don't think we have a problem with this
one.
Am I missing something?
Jonathan
> diff --git a/drivers/iio/industrialio-buffer.c
> b/drivers/iio/industrialio-buffer.c
> index 3c7e7380d1c3..9c2d0c97ed24 100644
> --- a/drivers/iio/industrialio-buffer.c
> +++ b/drivers/iio/industrialio-buffer.c
> @@ -320,7 +320,7 @@ static int iio_scan_mask_set(struct iio_dev *indio_dev,
> const unsigned long *mask;
> unsigned long *trialmask;
>
> - trialmask = bitmap_alloc(indio_dev->masklength, GFP_KERNEL);
> + trialmask = bitmap_zalloc(indio_dev->masklength, GFP_KERNEL);
> if (trialmask == NULL)
> return -ENOMEM;
> if (!indio_dev->masklength) {
>
>
