On 01-04-19, 09:37, Wen Yang wrote: > The call to of_find_compatible_node returns a node pointer with refcount > incremented thus it must be explicitly decremented after the last > usage. > > Detected by coccinelle with the following warnings: > ./drivers/cpufreq/armada-8k-cpufreq.c:187:1-7: ERROR: missing of_node_put; > acquired a node pointer with refcount incremented on line 130, but without a > corresponding object release within this function. > ./drivers/cpufreq/armada-8k-cpufreq.c:191:1-7: ERROR: missing of_node_put; > acquired a node pointer with refcount incremented on line 130, but without a > corresponding object release within this function. > > Signed-off-by: Wen Yang <wen.yan...@zte.com.cn> > Cc: Jason Cooper <ja...@lakedaemon.net> > Cc: Andrew Lunn <and...@lunn.ch> > Cc: Gregory Clement <gregory.clem...@bootlin.com> > Cc: Sebastian Hesselbarth <sebastian.hesselba...@gmail.com> > Cc: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <r...@rjwysocki.net> > Cc: Viresh Kumar <viresh.ku...@linaro.org> > Cc: linux-arm-ker...@lists.infradead.org > Cc: linux...@vger.kernel.org > Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org > --- > drivers/cpufreq/armada-8k-cpufreq.c | 1 + > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
I haven't received the cover-letter and patch 4/7 (because the tags in that commit were incorrect). I have applied all the 7 patches to my cpufreq tree though. Thanks. -- viresh
