On Tue 2019-04-02 11:29:00, Sergey Senozhatsky wrote:
> On (04/02/19 10:28), Feng Tang wrote:
> > > So my first thought was - let's not add a `bool flag', but instead add
> > > an `enum' with clear flag names, e.g. DUMP_ALL/DUMP_PENDING, etc.
> > > Something
> > > similar to what ftrace_dump(DUMP_ALL) does. And we already have
> > > panic_print
> > > bit-mask and panic_print_sys_info(), which controls what we print when in
> > > panic. So we can move console_flush_on_panic() to panic_print_sys_info()
> > > and handle different types of console_flush_on_panic() there:
> > >
> > > ---
> > >
> > > diff --git a/kernel/panic.c b/kernel/panic.c
> > > index 0ae0d7332f12..e142faaebbcd 100644
> > > --- a/kernel/panic.c
> > > +++ b/kernel/panic.c
> > > @@ -134,6 +134,11 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL(nmi_panic);
> > >
> > > static void panic_print_sys_info(void)
> > > {
> > > + if (panic_print & PANIC_PRINT_REPLAY_LOGBUF)
> > > + console_flush_on_panic(DUMP_ALL);
> > > + else
> > > + console_flush_on_panic(DUMP_PENDING);
> > > +
> > > if (panic_print & PANIC_PRINT_TASK_INFO)
> > > show_state();
> > >
> > > @@ -277,7 +282,6 @@ void panic(const char *fmt, ...)
> > > * panic() is not being callled from OOPS.
> > > */
> > > debug_locks_off();
> > > - console_flush_on_panic();
> > >
> > > panic_print_sys_info();
> > >
> >
> > I guess this is what my 2/2 patch exactly does :)
>
> Oh, indeed... I didn't check 2/2.
I suggest to merge the two patches into one. It will
still be rather small and easier to review.
Best Regards,
Petr
