On Wed, 10 Apr 2019 12:28:11 +0200
Thomas Gleixner <t...@linutronix.de> wrote:
> It's only used in the source file where it is defined and it's using the
> stack_trace_ namespace. Rename it to free it up for stack trace related
> functions.
>
Can you put it back to its original name "print_max_stack()" which was
changed by this commit:
bb99d8ccec7 ("tracing: Allow arch-specific stack tracer")
I actually want to do a clean up and remove all "trace_" functions that
are not a tracepoint. It's getting confusing to see a "trace_..." and
search for the corresponding TRACE_EVENT() macro and not being able to
find it.
Hmm, I'm not sure why Akashi changed that function to be global in the
first place. It looks like only check_stack() needed to be changed.
Akashi?
-- Steve
> Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <t...@linutronix.de>
> Cc: Steven Rostedt <rost...@goodmis.org>
> ---
> include/linux/ftrace.h | 1 -
> kernel/trace/trace_stack.c | 4 ++--
> 2 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
>
> --- a/include/linux/ftrace.h
> +++ b/include/linux/ftrace.h
> @@ -251,7 +251,6 @@ extern unsigned long stack_trace_max_siz
> extern arch_spinlock_t stack_trace_max_lock;
>
> extern int stack_tracer_enabled;
> -void stack_trace_print(void);
> int
> stack_trace_sysctl(struct ctl_table *table, int write,
> void __user *buffer, size_t *lenp,
> --- a/kernel/trace/trace_stack.c
> +++ b/kernel/trace/trace_stack.c
> @@ -41,7 +41,7 @@ static DEFINE_MUTEX(stack_sysctl_mutex);
> int stack_tracer_enabled;
> static int last_stack_tracer_enabled;
>
> -void stack_trace_print(void)
> +static void trace_stack_trace_print(void)
> {
> long i;
> int size;
> @@ -179,7 +179,7 @@ check_stack(unsigned long ip, unsigned l
> stack_trace_max.nr_entries = x;
>
> if (task_stack_end_corrupted(current)) {
> - stack_trace_print();
> + trace_stack_trace_print();
> BUG();
> }
>
>
