On Tue, Apr 9, 2019 at 8:43 PM Linus Torvalds <torva...@linux-foundation.org> wrote: > Either it's edge-triggered and you'll get one possibly spurious > interrupt for an old issue, or it's level-triggered and setting up the > hw should bring the irq line inactive and you'll be ok.
I think our key difference here is in how much we trust the device: knowing the quality of the firmware running on some of these devices, I wouldn't totally trust that they get it right. (It's not fatal if we allow a buggy firmware to provide an occasional spurious wakeup, but it's much less OK to allow it a window for flooding us with interrupts.) So while your suggestion is indeed correct for well-behaved devices, I think both approaches have value. > But I've applied your patch for now simply because it seems to be a > smaller change. Awesome, thanks! > But I think you should look into whether it can be fixed by just > requesting the irq once the hardware is really up (which may indeed be > as late as open time). Yes, I will take a look at that for future release cycles. It's a nice addition regardless, I think. Brian
