According to the Tegra124 TRM documentation, PLLM_MISC2 register doesn't
have the lock-enable bit as well as any other PLLM-related register. Hence
PLLM re-locking can't be initiated by software. The incorrect bit setting
should have been harmless since that bit is undefined according to TRM.
Tested-by: Steev Klimaszewski <st...@kali.org>
Signed-off-by: Dmitry Osipenko <dig...@gmail.com>
---
drivers/clk/tegra/clk-tegra124.c | 3 +--
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/clk/tegra/clk-tegra124.c b/drivers/clk/tegra/clk-tegra124.c
index df0018f7bf7e..940592375583 100644
--- a/drivers/clk/tegra/clk-tegra124.c
+++ b/drivers/clk/tegra/clk-tegra124.c
@@ -413,7 +413,6 @@ static struct tegra_clk_pll_params pll_m_params = {
.base_reg = PLLM_BASE,
.misc_reg = PLLM_MISC,
.lock_mask = PLL_BASE_LOCK,
- .lock_enable_bit_idx = PLL_MISC_LOCK_ENABLE,
.lock_delay = 300,
.max_p = 5,
.pdiv_tohw = pllm_p,
@@ -421,7 +420,7 @@ static struct tegra_clk_pll_params pll_m_params = {
.pmc_divnm_reg = PMC_PLLM_WB0_OVERRIDE,
.pmc_divp_reg = PMC_PLLM_WB0_OVERRIDE_2,
.freq_table = pll_m_freq_table,
- .flags = TEGRA_PLL_USE_LOCK | TEGRA_PLL_HAS_LOCK_ENABLE,
+ .flags = TEGRA_PLL_USE_LOCK,
};
static struct tegra_clk_pll_freq_table pll_e_freq_table[] = {
--
2.21.0
