On 4/15/19 12:51 PM, Peter Zijlstra wrote: >> +#define for_each_label_entry(key, entry, stop) >> \ >> + for (; (entry < stop) && (jump_entry_key(entry) == key); entry++) >> + > I don't really like this naming; most (all?) for_each_*() loops start > iteration and have the iteration variable as first argument. > > This should maybe be called: > > for_each_jump_entry_by_key_cont(entry, stop, key) > > and I realize that is a horrible name too.
Borislav did not like this helper too, so I am convinced: we do not need it. I will remove it in the next version. -- Daniel
