On Wed 17-04-19 19:36:21, Zhaoyang Huang wrote: > sorry for the confusion. What I mean is the basic idea doesn't change > as replacing the refault criteria from refault_distance to timestamp. > But the detailed implementation changed a lot, including fix bugs, > update the way of packing the timestamp, 32bit/64bit differentiation > etc. So it makes sense for starting a new context.
Not really. My take away from the previous discussion is that Johannes has questioned the timestamping approach itself. I wasn't following very closely so I might be wrong here but if that is really the case then it doesn't make much sense to improve the implementation if there is no consensus on the approach itself. -- Michal Hocko SUSE Labs
