From: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <pet...@infradead.org>

Instead of only selecting a local task, select a task for all SMT
siblings for every reschedule on the core (irrespective which logical
CPU does the reschedule).

NOTE: there is still potential for siblings rivalry.
NOTE: this is far too complicated; but thus far I've failed to
      simplify it further.

Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <pet...@infradead.org>
---
 kernel/sched/core.c  | 222 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-
 kernel/sched/sched.h |   5 +-
 2 files changed, 224 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)

diff --git a/kernel/sched/core.c b/kernel/sched/core.c
index e5bdc1c4d8d7..9e6e90c6f9b9 100644
--- a/kernel/sched/core.c
+++ b/kernel/sched/core.c
@@ -3574,7 +3574,7 @@ static inline void schedule_debug(struct task_struct 
*prev)
  * Pick up the highest-prio task:
  */
 static inline struct task_struct *
-pick_next_task(struct rq *rq, struct task_struct *prev, struct rq_flags *rf)
+__pick_next_task(struct rq *rq, struct task_struct *prev, struct rq_flags *rf)
 {
        const struct sched_class *class;
        struct task_struct *p;
@@ -3619,6 +3619,220 @@ pick_next_task(struct rq *rq, struct task_struct *prev, 
struct rq_flags *rf)
        BUG();
 }
 
+#ifdef CONFIG_SCHED_CORE
+
+static inline bool cookie_match(struct task_struct *a, struct task_struct *b)
+{
+       if (is_idle_task(a) || is_idle_task(b))
+               return true;
+
+       return a->core_cookie == b->core_cookie;
+}
+
+// XXX fairness/fwd progress conditions
+static struct task_struct *
+pick_task(struct rq *rq, const struct sched_class *class, struct task_struct 
*max)
+{
+       struct task_struct *class_pick, *cookie_pick;
+       unsigned long cookie = 0UL;
+
+       /*
+        * We must not rely on rq->core->core_cookie here, because we fail to 
reset
+        * rq->core->core_cookie on new picks, such that we can detect if we 
need
+        * to do single vs multi rq task selection.
+        */
+
+       if (max && max->core_cookie) {
+               WARN_ON_ONCE(rq->core->core_cookie != max->core_cookie);
+               cookie = max->core_cookie;
+       }
+
+       class_pick = class->pick_task(rq);
+       if (!cookie)
+               return class_pick;
+
+       cookie_pick = sched_core_find(rq, cookie);
+       if (!class_pick)
+               return cookie_pick;
+
+       /*
+        * If class > max && class > cookie, it is the highest priority task on
+        * the core (so far) and it must be selected, otherwise we must go with
+        * the cookie pick in order to satisfy the constraint.
+        */
+       if (cpu_prio_less(cookie_pick, class_pick) && core_prio_less(max, 
class_pick))
+               return class_pick;
+
+       return cookie_pick;
+}
+
+static struct task_struct *
+pick_next_task(struct rq *rq, struct task_struct *prev, struct rq_flags *rf)
+{
+       struct task_struct *next, *max = NULL;
+       const struct sched_class *class;
+       const struct cpumask *smt_mask;
+       int i, j, cpu;
+
+       if (!sched_core_enabled(rq))
+               return __pick_next_task(rq, prev, rf);
+
+       /*
+        * If there were no {en,de}queues since we picked (IOW, the task
+        * pointers are all still valid), and we haven't scheduled the last
+        * pick yet, do so now.
+        */
+       if (rq->core->core_pick_seq == rq->core->core_task_seq &&
+           rq->core->core_pick_seq != rq->core_sched_seq) {
+               WRITE_ONCE(rq->core_sched_seq, rq->core->core_pick_seq);
+
+               next = rq->core_pick;
+               if (next != prev) {
+                       put_prev_task(rq, prev);
+                       set_next_task(rq, next);
+               }
+               return next;
+       }
+
+       prev->sched_class->put_prev_task(rq, prev, rf);
+       if (!rq->nr_running)
+               newidle_balance(rq, rf);
+
+       cpu = cpu_of(rq);
+       smt_mask = cpu_smt_mask(cpu);
+
+       /*
+        * core->core_task_seq, core->core_pick_seq, rq->core_sched_seq
+        *
+        * @task_seq guards the task state ({en,de}queues)
+        * @pick_seq is the @task_seq we did a selection on
+        * @sched_seq is the @pick_seq we scheduled
+        *
+        * However, preemptions can cause multiple picks on the same task set.
+        * 'Fix' this by also increasing @task_seq for every pick.
+        */
+       rq->core->core_task_seq++;
+
+       /* reset state */
+       for_each_cpu(i, smt_mask) {
+               struct rq *rq_i = cpu_rq(i);
+
+               rq_i->core_pick = NULL;
+
+               if (i != cpu)
+                       update_rq_clock(rq_i);
+       }
+
+       /*
+        * Try and select tasks for each sibling in decending sched_class
+        * order.
+        */
+       for_each_class(class) {
+again:
+               for_each_cpu_wrap(i, smt_mask, cpu) {
+                       struct rq *rq_i = cpu_rq(i);
+                       struct task_struct *p;
+
+                       if (rq_i->core_pick)
+                               continue;
+
+                       /*
+                        * If this sibling doesn't yet have a suitable task to
+                        * run; ask for the most elegible task, given the
+                        * highest priority task already selected for this
+                        * core.
+                        */
+                       p = pick_task(rq_i, class, max);
+                       if (!p) {
+                               /*
+                                * If there weren't no cookies; we don't need
+                                * to bother with the other siblings.
+                                */
+                               if (i == cpu && !rq->core->core_cookie)
+                                       goto next_class;
+
+                               continue;
+                       }
+
+                       /*
+                        * Optimize the 'normal' case where there aren't any
+                        * cookies and we don't need to sync up.
+                        */
+                       if (i == cpu && !rq->core->core_cookie && 
!p->core_cookie) {
+                               next = p;
+                               goto done;
+                       }
+
+                       rq_i->core_pick = p;
+
+                       /*
+                        * If this new candidate is of higher priority than the
+                        * previous; and they're incompatible; we need to wipe
+                        * the slate and start over.
+                        *
+                        * NOTE: this is a linear max-filter and is thus bounded
+                        * in execution time.
+                        */
+                       if (!max || core_prio_less(max, p)) {
+                               struct task_struct *old_max = max;
+
+                               rq->core->core_cookie = p->core_cookie;
+                               max = p;
+
+                               if (old_max && !cookie_match(old_max, p)) {
+                                       for_each_cpu(j, smt_mask) {
+                                               if (j == i)
+                                                       continue;
+
+                                               cpu_rq(j)->core_pick = NULL;
+                                       }
+                                       goto again;
+                               }
+                       }
+               }
+next_class:;
+       }
+
+       rq->core->core_pick_seq = rq->core->core_task_seq;
+
+       /*
+        * Reschedule siblings
+        *
+        * NOTE: L1TF -- at this point we're no longer running the old task and
+        * sending an IPI (below) ensures the sibling will no longer be running
+        * their task. This ensures there is no inter-sibling overlap between
+        * non-matching user state.
+        */
+       for_each_cpu(i, smt_mask) {
+               struct rq *rq_i = cpu_rq(i);
+
+               WARN_ON_ONCE(!rq_i->core_pick);
+
+               if (i == cpu)
+                       continue;
+
+               if (rq_i->curr != rq_i->core_pick)
+                       resched_curr(rq_i);
+       }
+
+       rq->core_sched_seq = rq->core->core_pick_seq;
+       next = rq->core_pick;
+
+done:
+       set_next_task(rq, next);
+       return next;
+}
+
+#else /* !CONFIG_SCHED_CORE */
+
+static struct task_struct *
+pick_next_task(struct rq *rq, struct task_struct *prev, struct rq_flags *rf)
+{
+       return __pick_next_task(rq, prev, rf);
+}
+
+#endif /* CONFIG_SCHED_CORE */
+
 /*
  * __schedule() is the main scheduler function.
  *
@@ -5888,7 +6102,7 @@ static void migrate_tasks(struct rq *dead_rq, struct 
rq_flags *rf)
                /*
                 * pick_next_task() assumes pinned rq->lock:
                 */
-               next = pick_next_task(rq, &fake_task, rf);
+               next = __pick_next_task(rq, &fake_task, rf);
                BUG_ON(!next);
                put_prev_task(rq, next);
 
@@ -6344,7 +6558,11 @@ void __init sched_init(void)
 
 #ifdef CONFIG_SCHED_CORE
                rq->core = NULL;
+               rq->core_pick = NULL;
                rq->core_enabled = 0;
+               rq->core_tree = RB_ROOT;
+
+               rq->core_cookie = 0UL;
 #endif
        }
 
diff --git a/kernel/sched/sched.h b/kernel/sched/sched.h
index 16fb236eab7b..4cfde289610d 100644
--- a/kernel/sched/sched.h
+++ b/kernel/sched/sched.h
@@ -960,11 +960,15 @@ struct rq {
 #ifdef CONFIG_SCHED_CORE
        /* per rq */
        struct rq               *core;
+       struct task_struct      *core_pick;
        unsigned int            core_enabled;
+       unsigned int            core_sched_seq;
        struct rb_root          core_tree;
 
        /* shared state */
        unsigned int            core_task_seq;
+       unsigned int            core_pick_seq;
+       unsigned long           core_cookie;
 #endif
 };
 
@@ -1770,7 +1774,6 @@ static inline void put_prev_task(struct rq *rq, struct 
task_struct *prev)
 
 static inline void set_next_task(struct rq *rq, struct task_struct *next)
 {
-       WARN_ON_ONCE(rq->curr != next);
        next->sched_class->set_next_task(rq, next);
 }
 
-- 
2.17.1

Reply via email to