On 19-04-25 08:53:33, Stephen Boyd wrote: > Caution: EXT Email > > Quoting Abel Vesa (2019-04-24 00:13:48) > > > > Can you please be more specific and point out exactly which one isn't ? > > Is this a question for me? >
Nevermind. I'll send another version in the following days. > > > > > > > > FYI, I'm dropping this from my review queue under the assumption it will > > > be sent again. Also, it would be nice to not have the wrappers at all in > > > the next series so that everything is clk_hw based instead of clk based. > > > Otherwise, it looks good to me and I'd like to see this work completed. > > > Thanks! > > > > > > > I'll try to resend this before the end of next week. > > > > As for the wrappers, they need to stay in until the last user of the clk > > based API is switched to clk_hw based. That means all the remaining imx > > platforms (1 through 5, and then 8). I chosed to do the imx6 and imx7 > > first because these are easier to find. Once this is in, I'll move on > > with the imx8 and then the imx1 through imx5 (which are harder to find > > nowadays). > > > > Ok. I'm not thrilled to keep around legacy code because nobody is > testing out new kernels on these devices. If we can, we should try to > delete old drivers that don't get used anymore, but if we can't then > we should be able to modify and compile those drivers and wait for the > bug reports to come in if something is broken. > Yes, as I said, I'll put together some other patchseries for the older imx platforms (1 through 5) once this one gets in. >
