On Mon, Apr 29, 2019 at 11:39 PM Phil Auld <pa...@redhat.com> wrote: > > On Mon, Apr 29, 2019 at 09:25:35PM +0800 Li, Aubrey wrote: > > .--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------. > > |NA/AVX vanilla-SMT [std% / sem%] cpu% |coresched-SMT [std% / > > sem%] +/- cpu% | no-SMT [std% / sem%] +/- cpu% | > > |--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------| > > | 1/1 508.5 [ 0.2%/ 0.0%] 2.1% | 504.7 [ 1.1%/ > > 0.1%] -0.8% 2.1% | 509.0 [ 0.2%/ 0.0%] 0.1% 4.3% | > > | 2/2 1000.2 [ 1.4%/ 0.1%] 4.1% | 1004.1 [ 1.6%/ > > 0.2%] 0.4% 4.1% | 997.6 [ 1.2%/ 0.1%] -0.3% 8.1% | > > | 4/4 1912.1 [ 1.0%/ 0.1%] 7.9% | 1904.2 [ 1.1%/ > > 0.1%] -0.4% 7.9% | 1914.9 [ 1.3%/ 0.1%] 0.1% 15.1% | > > | 8/8 3753.5 [ 0.3%/ 0.0%] 14.9% | 3748.2 [ 0.3%/ > > 0.0%] -0.1% 14.9% | 3751.3 [ 0.4%/ 0.0%] -0.1% 30.5% | > > | 16/16 7139.3 [ 2.4%/ 0.2%] 30.3% | 7137.9 [ 1.8%/ > > 0.2%] -0.0% 30.3% | 7049.2 [ 2.4%/ 0.2%] -1.3% 60.4% | > > | 32/32 10899.0 [ 4.2%/ 0.4%] 60.3% | 10780.3 [ 4.4%/ > > 0.4%] -1.1% 55.9% | 10339.2 [ 9.6%/ 0.9%] -5.1% 97.7% | > > | 64/64 15086.1 [11.5%/ 1.2%] 97.7% | 14262.0 [ 8.2%/ > > 0.8%] -5.5% 82.0% | 11168.7 [22.2%/ 1.7%] -26.0% 100.0% | > > |128/128 15371.9 [22.0%/ 2.2%] 100.0% | 14675.8 [14.4%/ > > 1.4%] -4.5% 82.8% | 10963.9 [18.5%/ 1.4%] -28.7% 100.0% | > > |256/256 15990.8 [22.0%/ 2.2%] 100.0% | 12227.9 [10.3%/ > > 1.0%] -23.5% 73.2% | 10469.9 [19.6%/ 1.7%] -34.5% 100.0% | > > '--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------' > > > > That's really nice and clear. > > We start to see the penalty for the coresched at 32/32, leaving some cpus > more idle than otherwise. > But it's pretty good overall, for this benchmark at least. > > Is this with stock v2 or with any of the fixes posted after? I wonder how > much the fixes for > the race that violates the rule effects this, for example. >
Yeah, this data is based on v2 without any fixes after. I also tried some fixes potential to performance impact but no luck so far. Please let me know if anything I missed. Thanks, -Aubrey
