On 30/04/2019 16:00, Halil Pasic wrote:
On Fri, 26 Apr 2019 15:01:27 +0200
Pierre Morel <pmo...@linux.ibm.com> wrote:
diff --git a/drivers/s390/crypto/vfio_ap_private.h
b/drivers/s390/crypto/vfio_ap_private.h
index 18dcc4d..7cc02ff 100644
--- a/drivers/s390/crypto/vfio_ap_private.h
+++ b/drivers/s390/crypto/vfio_ap_private.h
@@ -4,6 +4,7 @@
*
* Author(s): Tony Krowiak <akrow...@linux.ibm.com>
* Halil Pasic <pa...@linux.ibm.com>
+ * Pierre Morel <pmo...@linux.ibm.com>
*
* Copyright IBM Corp. 2018
*/
@@ -90,4 +91,14 @@ struct ap_matrix_mdev {
extern int vfio_ap_mdev_register(void);
extern void vfio_ap_mdev_unregister(void);
+struct vfio_ap_queue {
+ struct ap_matrix_mdev *matrix_mdev;
+ unsigned long a_nib;
+ unsigned long a_pfn;
+ unsigned long p_pfn;
+ int apqn;
+#define VFIO_AP_ISC_INVALID 0xff
How about -1?
+ unsigned char a_isc;
+ unsigned char p_isc;
+};
#endif /* _VFIO_AP_PRIVATE_H_ */
I assume a_ and p_ are for argument and private, or? Anyway it would be
nice to have nicer names for these.
If the a_ members are really just arguments, we could probably live
without the. I'm fine either way.
Regards,
Halil
Since there will be another iteration to modify other part of this patch
I will simplify this handling and make the names clearer.
Thanks
Pierre
--
Pierre Morel
Linux/KVM/QEMU in Böblingen - Germany
